The Falsework
Accused of using AI to write her debut novel, Mira Oyelaran faces an authenticity review that could end her career. She has thirty days to prove her humanity using a physical archive of drafts before a panel of skeptical strangers.
In this collection
8 entries
Authenticity Review Process
When a work is flagged for 'reading like AI,' the author is granted a thirty-day window to present evidence to a panel. The process lacks a formal judge or standardized legal procedure, relying instead on the subjective decision of the panel members.
World & Mechanics
Mira Oyelaran
The protagonist and accused author whose debut novel is the subject of an authenticity dispute.
Characters
The Draft Archive
Created over several years through Mira's meticulous habit of keeping every draft and revision of her manuscript.
Key Objects
The environment is defined by a pervasive sense of 'AI panic,' characterized by institutional pressure, uncertainty, and a climate of suspicion regarding the authenticity of creative work.
Harrow & Vale Publishing
The environment is defined by a pervasive sense of 'AI panic,' characterized by institutional pressure, uncertainty, and a climate of suspicion regarding the authenticity of creative work.
Locations
Denise Kwao
Denise Kwao is Mira Oyelaran's editor and the primary catalyst for the story's conflict, having raised the initial accusation that Mira's prose resembles AI-generated content.
Characters
The Review Room
The room is defined by a lack of formal process, creating an environment of clinical uncertainty where the burden of proof lies on the accused.
Locations
The Authenticity Mandate
Julian Voss and the newly formed authenticity review department impose a thirty-day deadline for Mira to prove her authorship or lose her career.
Plot & Structure
The Burden of Proof
The requirement for an accused author to demonstrate the human origin of their work within a thirty-day window to a panel of strangers.
Themes & Motifs